Invest on the lives of people

After many years of experience in Tech and having single handedly funded and built my company company and businesses and still broke, there are only two kinds of people I can take advice from: someone who is currently where I want to be or has gone past that stage, and a madman.

As I dey look for a small ₦100 million to solve regulatory problem and scale my business, once it’s finally resolved, some random person on the internet will suddenly want to advise me. Advise yourself first.🤡🤡

Now working with investors and setting up the ground for better future.

My wallet balance on ConX app. You can fund your account and use it for any transactions on ConX or move it to your personal bank account. You can equally earn by referring people to join ConX.
You can sell anything ranging from your pictures, videos, courses, books, tutorials, scripts, movies, design etc.
Just give it a try now.

Elon Musk sparked debate online after calling medical school “pointless,” arguing that rapid advances in artificial intelligence will soon outperform human doctors.

Speaking on the Moonshots podcast with Peter Diamandis, Musk said AI-powered robots could surpass human surgeons within three to five years.

Musk claimed that AI will deliver medical care better than what even world leaders receive today, making long medical training unnecessary.

When asked directly if people should still go to medical school, he replied, “Yes. Pointless,” adding that this could apply to most forms of education.

He explained that becoming a great doctor takes many years, while medical knowledge constantly changes. In contrast, AI systems can learn faster and share experience instantly.

Musk believes robots like Tesla’s Optimus, combined with advanced AI software and chips, will soon perform more surgeries than all human surgeons combined.

#ElonMusk #AI #AIinHealthcare #Robotics #Optimus

Newly unearthed documents reveal the sugar industry paid Harvard scientists in the 1960s to shift the blame for heart disease from sugar to saturated fat.

In a calculated move to protect market share, the Sugar Research Foundation (SRF) funded a 1967 literature review that effectively redirected the national health conversation.

Internal documents show the industry group paid Harvard researchers—one of whom was an ad hoc board member for the lobby—the equivalent of $50,000 today to "refute" studies linking sugar to heart disease.

Published in the New England Journal of Medicine without disclosing its funding source, the review applied rigorous skepticism to any evidence implicating sugar while giving a pass to flawed data that blamed dietary fat.

This strategic manipulation ensured that for decades, fat became the primary villain in the American diet, while sugar consumption was allowed to soar.

The legacy of this deception has had a profound impact on public health, potentially contributing to the rise of obesity and chronic illness over the last half-century. By shaping the scientific debate at such a high level, the sugar industry successfully influenced dietary guidelines and consumer behavior for generations. Experts warn that this playbook is still in use today, with modern food and beverage giants frequently sponsoring research to minimize the perceived risks of their products.

This revelation serves as a stark reminder of the need for transparency in nutrition science and suggests that policymakers must look more critically at industry-funded studies when crafting health recommendations.

source: Kearns, C. E., Schmidt, L. A., & Glantz, S. A.. Sugar Industry and Coronary Heart Disease Research: A Historical Analysis of Internal Industry Documents. JAMA Internal Medicine.

The Executive President of Sri Lanka still ruling after 5 tenures and not backing down. Though not healthy but still retained.
The question now is what is he doing there?

A new 'one-second' spray-on could revolutionize medicine by instantly stopping catastrophic bleeding…

Researchers at the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) have engineered a next-generation 'AGCL powder' that can halt severe bleeding in just one second.

Unlike traditional bandages or patches that struggle with irregular or deep gashes, this sprayable solution reacts instantly with ions in the blood to create a robust, physical hydrogel barrier. Developed in collaboration with an active-duty Army Major, the material is designed specifically for high-pressure situations like combat zones and disaster sites where every second determines whether a patient survives.

The powder is made from biocompatible natural materials including alginate and chitosan, allowing it to absorb seven times its weight in blood while promoting rapid tissue regeneration. Its high adhesive strength allows it to withstand significant blood pressure, and it remains stable in hot or humid storage for up to two years. Beyond military use, this 'spin-off' technology is expected to transform civilian emergency care and surgical procedures, offering a reliable, shelf-stable way to prevent blood loss in underserved areas and hospitals alike.

source: Son, Y., Pak, K., Lee, T., Prayogo, M. C., Choi, J., Kang, S., Kang, M., Oh, B., Sun, S. Y., Kim, S., Im, S. G., Jon, S., & Park, S. (2025). An Ionic Gelation Powder for Ultrafast Hemostasis and Accelerated Wound Healing. Advanced Functional Materials.

What does this mean to our modern life?

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has issued a severe diplomatic ultimatum in response to President Trump’s recent claims about NATO, threatening to dismantle critical pillars of the United States' presence in Europe. Meloni’s proposal includes the potential closure of vital strategic hubs such as Aviano Air Base and NAS Sigonella, which would effectively cripple American military projection across the Mediterranean and North Africa. Alongside military shifts, her stance calls for a full alignment with European Union trade suspensions and a symbolic boycott of iconic American brands like McDonald's to reject U.S. cultural soft power. This defiance from a traditionally conservative ally signals a unprecedented unification of European political factions against Washington’s current foreign policy, marking a potential collapse of long-standing transatlantic security and economic alliances.

Now I see another artificial attachment that is trending.
What is the point to this?